How Many Donald Trumps Does It Take To Change A Lightbulb?

Wednesday morning at 7:15 a.m. found me in the ambulatory surgery center on the third floor of the Bensley Pavilion at Summit Health’s Berkeley Heights campus.

I was there for that procedure gastroenterologists suggest you have every few years — the one no one wants to discuss but comedians have built entire careers around. A kind but matter-of-fact nurse deposited me in Bay 17. After confirming I was who I claimed to be, she left me to disrobe, seal my clothes and belongings into plastic bags, and step into one of those hospital gowns — the kind that makes you wonder why, with all the advances in modern medicine, we still submit to such ridiculous garments.

All gowned up, lying on the hospital bed, covered in a heated blanket the nurse had tucked around me before departing, I was left to wait. With my phone sealed into one of those plastic bags, there would be no doomscrolling to dissolve time and rot my brain. I was forced (don’t tell anyone) to think.

The first thing I focused on was the ceiling tile. Instead of a standard acoustic tile, the design team at Summit Health had installed an opaque plastic panel with an image of the sky and lovely fluffy clouds. It was certainly better to look at than a plain tile, but in no way could it be mistaken for the actual outdoors. It made me wonder about a few things. First, did someone conduct an expensive and far-reaching study showing that looking at a fake sky reduces the stress of patients waiting for a procedure? Or was this a marketing ploy by “big tile” to sell more expensive products to “big medicine”?

My mind did not stay there long. I am sure some Eastern mystic could have found much to contemplate in that tile, but I lack the depth to do that. Instead, my mind drifted to my childhood — not surprising, since the first ten years of my life were spent in this neighborhood, just a few blocks from where I lay.

In front of where Summit Health now stands is literally where the sidewalk ended. On occasion, my brother and I would wait there for my father when he walked home from his job at Bell Telephone Laboratories, only a stone’s throw away.

Across the street was Bishoff’s Farm — an actual working farm, one of the last holdouts from the days when New Jersey had truly earned the name “The Garden State.” David and I loved it, not for the produce but for the nickel our parents would sometimes press into our hands so we could buy a bottle — yes, a glass bottle — from the wonderfully complicated vending machine. You had to guide the bottle through a little maze to free it from the cooler, which somehow made the drink taste better before you even opened it.

Directly adjacent to where I now lay was a large apple orchard. Every autumn we eagerly awaited the owner’s hanging of a large apple on the ancient oak bordering Mountain Avenue, announcing that freshly pressed apple cider and newly picked apples were available. I remember being amazed by the huge manual apple press that used cheesecloth as a filter — and drinking so much cider my stomach ached.

Just then, a new patient was brought into the bay next to mine. It was an extremely young child, perhaps two or three, and she was not happy — at the top of her lungs. Shrieking, crying, exclaiming, and kicking, she actively conveyed her displeasure with her situation to the rest of us awaiting our procedures.

Needless to say, the warm and misty palace of memories I had so carefully constructed to shield me from reality came crashing down. Instead, I now had to deal with the vocal emotions of a toddler whose screams were giving voice to all the fears I had locked behind some steel-gated door in my subconscious. It was perturbing.

I didn’t want to be upset with the child. Who could blame a toddler for screaming when they are scared? But I am human, and this child was hitting every exposed nerve — somewhere between fingernails on a blackboard and hearing Nappy Don speak. Not good. So I took a beat, then a deep breath, and tried to focus on something else.

Oddly, for this Jewish guy, the first thing that came to mind was that it was Ash Wednesday. Which reminded me of my friend Fran Farrell, a devout Catholic in the same way Stephen Colbert practices his faith — always trying to do the right thing with humor and grace. Fran died a few years ago after a long battle with ALS, a disease he refused to let defeat him. I often think of him in difficult situations (he always had better angels than I did) and imagine the advice he would have given me. No doubt he would have reminded me the child was terrified and expressing it the only way she knew how — that my sympathy should lie with her, not my fragile state of mind. I had the tools to feel compassion, despite the fact that someone was about to take a picture of me from the inside out using a portal meant for exiting as an entrance.

It made me recall a phone conversation I once had with my sister during a period in my life when I spent more time in airplane seats than in my own recliner. I had called her from my seat while we were at the gate when an infant in the row behind me decided to demonstrate how loudly her vocal cords could resonate. I may have made some disparaging remark about infants on airplanes when my much younger sister schooled me. She said, “You have no idea what it’s like to travel with small children. Do you know how frustrating and embarrassing it is for a parent to have a venting, cranky child on an airplane? Instead of feeling sorry for yourself, you should have a little compassion for the mom.”

Just then Dr. Propofol (not his real name) showed up and asked if I was ready for some “milk of amnesia.” Okay, he didn’t say that exactly, but it was the implication — and before I knew it, I didn’t.

Later that day I was doomscrolling. Please don’t judge me. I had learned from previous experiences with anesthesia that doing anything requiring thought or reflection is ill-advised afterward. (I still have not been able to unload that timeshare in Chechnya.) Doomscrolling was practically designed for post-amnesia behavior.

Anyway, I came across a video of Stephen Colbert being interviewed by Dua Lipa. I know — weird — but she asked him an exceptional question: how his faith informed his comedy. He said:

“Sadness is like a little bit of an emotional death, but not a defeat if you can find a way to laugh about it. Because the laughter keeps you from having fear of it. And fear is the thing that keeps you turning to evil devices to save you from the sadness. So if there’s some relationship between my faith and my comedy, it’s that no matter what happens you are never defeated. You must understand and see this in the light of eternity, and find some way to love and laugh with each other.”

Perhaps it was because I was still high from the Jackson juice that I seemed to have an epiphany at that point.

Donald Trump is that terribly unhappy child who does not have the skills to express himself except to bellow, whine, cry, and stamp his cankled feet. We have the tools to ignore his imagined demons and hissy fits. We should not let him occupy our thoughts but instead focus on those who are really suffering: the undocumented and documented who feel ICE has put a target on their back; the people of color whose culture, history, and place within our society he seems hell-bent on undermining; the transgender and LGBTQ communities he seeks to marginalize and demonize; the economically challenged whose safety net he seeks to dismantle to provide tax breaks for the rich and powerful.

And how do we confront a man who never smiles, has no sense of humor, and seems preternaturally incapable of laughter? Humor and joy. He can never defeat us if we keep our sense of humor and use it as a cudgel against him. Here is an example:

Q: How many Donald Trumps does it take to change a light bulb?
A: One — he just holds the bulb still and insists the world revolves around him.

Fear demands attention. It always has. Some express it in tears, some in anger, some in power. But laughter is the one response fear cannot survive, because it refuses to grant fear authority over the moment. We cannot stop people from shouting, but we can refuse to become people who shout back in kind. If we keep our humanity — and our sense of humor — then the noise becomes just noise, and the frightened child, whether in a hospital bay or on a much larger stage, no longer gets to decide who we are.

Posted in Fake News, Humor / satire, personal essay, Politics and Society, Trump Opposition | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Many Donald Trump’s Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?

Wednesday morning at 7:15 a.m. found me in the ambulatory surgery center on the third floor of the Bensley Pavilion at Summit Health’s Berkeley Heights campus.

I was there for that procedure gastroenterologists suggest you have every few years — the one no one wants to discuss but comedians have built entire careers around. A kind but matter-of-fact nurse deposited me in Bay 17. After confirming I was who I claimed to be, she left me to disrobe, seal my clothes and belongings into plastic bags, and step into one of those hospital gowns — the kind that makes you wonder why, with all the advances in modern medicine, we still submit to such ridiculous garments.

All gowned up, lying on the hospital bed, covered in a heated blanket the nurse had tucked around me before departing, I was left to wait. With my phone sealed into one of those plastic bags, there would be no doomscrolling to dissolve time and rot my brain. I was forced (don’t tell anyone) to think.

The first thing I focused on was the ceiling tile. Instead of a standard acoustic tile, the design team at Summit Health had installed an opaque plastic panel with an image of the sky and lovely fluffy clouds. It was certainly better to look at than a plain tile, but in no way could it be mistaken for the actual outdoors. It made me wonder about a few things. First, did someone conduct an expensive and far-reaching study showing that looking at a fake sky reduces the stress of patients waiting for a procedure? Or was this a marketing ploy by “big tile” to sell more expensive products to “big medicine”?

My mind did not stay there long. I am sure some Eastern mystic could have found much to contemplate in that tile, but I lack the depth to do that. Instead, my mind drifted to my childhood — not surprising, since the first ten years of my life were spent in this neighborhood, just a few blocks from where I lay.

In front of where Summit Health now stands is literally where the sidewalk ended. On occasion, my brother and I would wait there for my father when he walked home from his job at Bell Telephone Laboratories, only a stone’s throw away.

Across the street was Bishoff’s Farm — an actual working farm, one of the last holdouts from the days when New Jersey had truly earned the name “The Garden State.” David and I loved it, not for the produce but for the nickel our parents would sometimes press into our hands so we could buy a bottle — yes, a glass bottle — from the wonderfully complicated vending machine. You had to guide the bottle through a little maze to free it from the cooler, which somehow made the drink taste better before you even opened it.

Directly adjacent to where I now lay was a large apple orchard. Every autumn we eagerly awaited the owner’s hanging of a large apple on the ancient oak bordering Mountain Avenue, announcing that freshly pressed apple cider and newly picked apples were available. I remember being amazed by the huge manual apple press that used cheesecloth as a filter — and drinking so much cider my stomach ached.

Just then, a new patient was brought into the bay next to mine. It was an extremely young child, perhaps two or three, and she was not happy — at the top of her lungs. Shrieking, crying, exclaiming, and kicking, she actively conveyed her displeasure with her situation to the rest of us awaiting our procedures.

Needless to say, the warm and misty palace of memories I had so carefully constructed to shield me from reality came crashing down. Instead, I now had to deal with the vocal emotions of a toddler whose screams were giving voice to all the fears I had locked behind some steel-gated door in my subconscious. It was perturbing.

I didn’t want to be upset with the child. Who could blame a toddler for screaming when they are scared? But I am human, and this child was hitting every exposed nerve — somewhere between fingernails on a blackboard and hearing Nappy Don speak. Not good. So I took a beat, then a deep breath, and tried to focus on something else.

Oddly, for this Jewish guy, the first thing that came to mind was that it was Ash Wednesday. Which reminded me of my friend Fran Farrell, a devout Catholic in the same way Stephen Colbert practices his faith — always trying to do the right thing with humor and grace. Fran died a few years ago after a long battle with ALS, a disease he refused to let defeat him. I often think of him in difficult situations (he always had better angels than I did) and imagine the advice he would have given me. No doubt he would have reminded me the child was terrified and expressing it the only way she knew how — that my sympathy should lie with her, not my fragile state of mind. I had the tools to feel compassion, despite the fact that someone was about to take a picture of me from the inside out using a portal meant for exiting as an entrance.

It made me recall a phone conversation I once had with my sister during a period in my life when I spent more time in airplane seats than in my own recliner. I had called her from my seat while we were at the gate when an infant in the row behind me decided to demonstrate how loudly her vocal cords could resonate. I may have made some disparaging remark about infants on airplanes when my much younger sister schooled me. She said, “You have no idea what it’s like to travel with small children. Do you know how frustrating and embarrassing it is for a parent to have a venting, cranky child on an airplane? Instead of feeling sorry for yourself, you should have a little compassion for the mom.”

Just then Dr. Propofol (not his real name) showed up and asked if I was ready for some “milk of amnesia.” Okay, he didn’t say that exactly, but it was the implication — and before I knew it, I didn’t.

Later that day I was doomscrolling. Please don’t judge me. I had learned from previous experiences with anesthesia that doing anything requiring thought or reflection is ill-advised afterward. (I still have not been able to unload that timeshare in Chechnya.) Doomscrolling was practically designed for post-amnesia behavior.

Anyway, I came across a video of Stephen Colbert being interviewed by Dua Lipa. I know — weird — but she asked him an exceptional question: how his faith informed his comedy. He said:

“Sadness is like a little bit of an emotional death, but not a defeat if you can find a way to laugh about it. Because the laughter keeps you from having fear of it. And fear is the thing that keeps you turning to evil devices to save you from the sadness. So if there’s some relationship between my faith and my comedy, it’s that no matter what happens you are never defeated. You must understand and see this in the light of eternity, and find some way to love and laugh with each other.”

Perhaps it was because I was still high from the Jackson juice that I seemed to have an epiphany at that point.

Donald Trump is that terribly unhappy child who does not have the skills to express himself except to bellow, whine, cry, and stamp his cankled feet. We have the tools to ignore his imagined demons and hissy fits. We should not let him occupy our thoughts but instead focus on those who are really suffering: the undocumented and documented who feel ICE has put a target on their back; the people of color whose culture, history, and place within our society he seems hell-bent on undermining; the transgender and LGBTQ communities he seeks to marginalize and demonize; the economically challenged whose safety net he seeks to dismantle to provide tax breaks for the rich and powerful.

And how do we confront a man who never smiles, has no sense of humor, and seems preternaturally incapable of laughter? Humor and joy. He can never defeat us if we keep our sense of humor and use it as a cudgel against him. Here is an example:

Q: How many Donald Trumps does it take to change a light bulb?
A: One — he just holds the bulb still and insists the world revolves around him.

Fear demands attention. It always has. Some express it in tears, some in anger, some in power. But laughter is the one response fear cannot survive, because it refuses to grant fear authority over the moment. We cannot stop people from shouting, but we can refuse to become people who shout back in kind. If we keep our humanity — and our sense of humor — then the noise becomes just noise, and the frightened child, whether in a hospital bay or on a much larger stage, no longer gets to decide who we are.

Posted in culture, Humor / satire, opinion, personal essay, Politics and Society, Trump Opposition | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Pomeranian Presidency.

Just before falling asleep on Tuesday night, my phone — resting peacefully on my night table — chirped. Then chirped again. Then again.

I have a rule about checking my phone before bed. The phone at that hour is a portal to doom-scrolling and existential questions like: Who in God’s name can still support Donald Trump and call himself a patriot? Questions that are imponderable and extremely REM-cycle adverse. And as someone who struggles to sleep well I take my rule more seriously than Pam Bondi takes the rule of law.

But this felt different. That many alerts that fast? Maybe — finally — the news many of us have quietly hoped for since The Great Sleazer took the oath of office again. Something restoring sanity, duty, maybe even the return of complete sentences.

I picked up my phone.

Needless to say it was not the news I was looking for. Instead, the FAA had closed airspace around El Paso International Airport for ten days citing “special security reasons.” One report said it was the first domestic closure for security since 9/11. Odd. Why El Paso? Why ten days?

I put the phone down, turned up the white noise machine, and fell asleep.

I did not sleep well. Sadly, but true to my nature, my subconscious would not let go. Experience has taught me the monarch of Mar-A-Lago’s regime follows a pattern: panic first, deny later — like a cat that misses a jump onto a windowsill and immediately pretends it meant to sit on the floor and groom itself… while filing a lawsuit against the windowsill.

The next morning proved me right. While Rosie determined which exact spot in the frozen tundra she would leave a message for her friends, I responded to yet another chirp on my phone.

Sure enough. The administration believed Mexican cartels were flying drug drones across the border. Their super-secret radar spotted an intruder. Jets were scrambled. Weapons deployed. National security saved.

And they brilliantly shot down the intruder — a single mylar party balloon.

I thought: thousands stranded. Millions spent. The Air Force engaged in aerial combat with a birthday decoration that probably said Feliz Quinceañera and came free with a pack of streamers.

The administration made no announcement. No correction. No apology. They simply did what this presidency does best: pretended nothing happened and licked the metaphorical fur clean while insisting the balloon attacked first.

I was thinking this would be amusing — cocktail-party absurdism — when the most disliked dog in our neighborhood made an appearance. It is a small orange Pomeranian whose bark sounds like a squeaky toy discovered espresso and decided the whole neighborhood needed a press conference. And it barks at everything. Nonstop. Other dogs. People. Amazon trucks. The wind rustling through trees. Possibly the concept of wind itself.

It had just begun barking at a snowbank which had apparently gotten in its way when it hit me.

Trump is an orange Pomeranian.

He struts about thinking he is far more important than he is and barks at everything whether it requires it or not — especially if it doesn’t.

Take elections.

The Pomeranian in Chief fervently believes that our election system has completely failed — that since he failed to win the 2020 election there must be something methodically wrong with our system rather than, say, voters. He believes this so much that he has threatened to nationalize elections (which is constitutionally prohibited) and has introduced the “Safeguard American Voter Act,” which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote and require showing ID when one votes.

But he is barking at nothing.

In the last election 158 million votes were cast and only a few dozen illegal votes confirmed. Because our election system works. Not only does every state require proof of citizenship to register but voting illegally is almost impossible as most states have paper backups in nearly every state — a system so redundant it would frustrate NASA.

In other words, Sir Barks-A-Lot was yapping at nothing. Worse, his cure would disenfranchise millions, especially married women whose legal names changed, and cost $10–20 billion.

A very expensive solution to a statistical rounding error and a personal grievance.

Then there is his yapping about Minneapolis. He barked that it was a city so ripe with dangerous undocumented murderers, rapists, and criminals it required Operation Metro Surge, with 3,000 ICE and Border Patrol agents descending on the city. He was going to clean up that city even though the crime rate was the lowest it had been in years and Minnesota doesn’t even crack the top 20 states with undocumented immigrants.

Operation Metro Surge: 3,000 federal agents deployed to confront a supposed wave of undocumented violent criminals in a state not even in the top 20 for undocumented population and experiencing declining crime.

It turns out it was like the snowbank our neighborhood annoyance encountered.

There was no there, there.

He spent $250,000,000 and netted 4,000 detainees with only 30 accused of violent crimes.

It was Sir Barks-Too-Much yapping — except this time he was farting tear gas and using the Constitution as a pee-pee pad while insisting the pad had started it.

Sadly, this one bad dog has taught his bad habits to other dogs.

Did you hear Pam Bondi testify before Congress? (I imagine her as a ShiTzu with a bow in her hair.) Instead of answering questions she just barked out insults and made a mess on the carpet someone else will have to clean up — then blamed the carpet.

Don’t get me started on his pit bull, Karoline Leavitt. A big bark, a nasty bite, protecting territory with absolutely no idea why she is doing what she is doing but clearly hoping for a Scooby snack and a Fox News booking.

Walking back to my apartment, I began to think of Trump and his cabinet in that famous painting of dogs playing poker. Here is what I came up with so far:

Stephen Miller — the shelter dog who spent too long alone and now guards empty food bowls as a matter of ideology.

JD Vance — Beagle. Looks approachable and friendly but is constantly tracking a scent and howls at the moon even on cloudy nights and economic data.

Marco Rubio — Golden Retriever. Polished, camera-ready, eager to perform in public spaces. Will do anything for a treat and favorite pastime is humping whichever leg polls highest.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — Border Collie. High energy and intense, so focused on its own interpretation of the world it ignores everyone else calling it — including veterinarians.

Thinking of the current administration as dogs was a wonderful de-stressing visualization. And if you have suggestions about other members of the administration please feel free to post them in the comments.

But it also made me realize democracies don’t usually collapse with a bang.

Sometimes they just lose sleep because something keeps barking at shadows — and everyone is too tired to notice when there is actually something worth barking about.

Posted in Trump Opposition | Leave a comment

Not A Mistake: Donald Trump and the Politics of “Not a Mistake”

It is not a mistake…

When federal prosecutors in Minneapolis sought a warrant to collect evidence from Renee Goods’ vehicle after the shooting, they were told to stand down. They were told by senior officials in the White House, including Kash Patel, that they were concerned the evidence uncovered would completely contradict Agent Orange’s claim that she “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the CE officer.”

The FBI’s and federal prosecutors’ job is not to find evidence to fit the government’s narrative. It is the opposite: collect evidence, determine the facts, and prosecute when there is enough evidence to support that prosecution.

Instead, Trump’s FBI and Justice Department worked actively not to support justice but the whims of a president whose 37,000 lies in his first term speak Encyclopedia Britannica–sized volumes about his relationship with the truth. This is not supposed to happen. DOJ rules explicitly state that officials in the White House are not supposed to interfere with investigations and that decisions must be based on fact and law, regardless of political benefit or harm.

Which is why the senior prosecutors and five others in the Minneapolis office of the DOJ resigned. This set off a broader wave of resignations that left the office severely understaffed and in crisis. It caused one federal prosecutor to break down in front of a judge and beg him to throw her in jail for contempt so she could get some sleep. Worse, serious cases—such as fatal attacks on Minnesota lawmakers, terrorism cases, and even the sprawling, years-long investigation of fraud in Minnesota’s social services program—came to a grinding halt.

This is a deliberate case of Donald Trump’s egomaniacal narcissism and, according to law, grounds for impeachment. Just saying.

It is not a mistake…

When Kaitlin Collins, a veteran White House reporter, asked a serious question about the Epstein files, she asked what he would say to the survivors who felt that justice hadn’t been served. Her question was in the best tradition of journalism—holding truth to power—and an opportunity for an innocent man to express sympathy. Something he has never done.

He chose to attack her instead. He called her “the worst reporter,” accused CNN of being dishonest with low ratings, and then, in a misogynistic and paternalistic trope, said she didn’t smile enough. No male reporter would ever be told to smile more. Her job is to seek answers the American public has the right to know.

There is no doubt he is frightened that the truth about him and Jeffrey Epstein will come to light. The person who reviewed the Epstein files was Todd Blanche, currently the Deputy Attorney General but formerly Donald Trump’s personal attorney—a glaring conflict of interest. Even with that heavy thumb on the scale, the released files mention Donald Trump’s name 38,000 times.

For comparison:

Times Hitler is mentioned in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich — 4,000

Times Harry is mentioned throughout the seven Harry Potter books — 18,956

Times Jesus is mentioned in the Bible — 1,000

I am pretty sure even Ghislaine Maxwell was not mentioned as many times as Donald J. Trump.

And it makes you wonder why Bill Clinton, whose name is only mentioned in flight logs 16 times, is being called before the House Oversight Committee to testify, and the Monarch of Mar-a-Lago has not been.

The release of the files has launched criminal investigations in seven countries. Yet in this country, there is no active investigation into the people of wealth and power, including Donald J. Trump, who attended Epstein’s parties. I guess it helps when Deputy Attorney General is your personal attorney.

You can speculate into the next millennium about what Donald Trump may have done with the young girls that Jeffrey Epstein recruited as sex toys for the rich and powerful. But it strains credulity and common sense to think that a person who is mentioned 38,000 times in the files did not know what was going on there and actively condoned it through his silence. Let me be blunter. Donald actively condoned child rape through silence, and now his Justice Department is as well.

It is not a mistake.

When Donald Trump released a video depicting himself as “King of the Jungle” and portraying the Obamas as apes, it was so clearly racist that even normally silent and toady Republicans condemned it.

• Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) said the post was “wrong and incredibly offensive” and should be deleted with an apology.

• Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) called the video “totally unacceptable” and also suggested the president apologize.

• Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) said even if it was intended as a meme, “a reasonable person sees the racist context,” and urged removal and an apology.

• Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) described the video as appalling.

And Tim Scott, the only Black Republican senator, said, “That is the most racist thing I have seen out of this White House.” This is an odd condemnation because, in addition to being critical of the video, it is an admission that he has seen other racist behavior from Trump and his administration.

The Trump administration tried to tamp down the criticism of this racist trope. First, Karoline Leavitt, in full Karen mode, said, “This is from an internet meme depicting President Trump as the King of the Jungle and Democrats as characters from The Lion King. Please stop the fake outrage and report on something today that actually matters to the American public.”

Call me crazy. I think the American people want to know whether or not the President of the United States is a racist.

Her comments were so out of touch that eight hours after it was put up, the video was taken down, blaming an aide of the president for making an error of judgment.

But when asked directly, Trump admitted to watching the video and said he was unaware of the racially offensive ending. Did he mean he didn’t see the ending or that it was racially offensive? I will leave that up to you, but you know the answer. Especially considering that when asked about apologizing for the video, he refused to apologize, saying, “I didn’t make a mistake.”

Let’s take the president at his word (strange as that sounds). He doesn’t make mistakes. It means that Renee Good will never see justice for her murder because Trump doesn’t make mistakes. Those who have committed terrorism and social service fraud in Minnesota will never be prosecuted because the 47 is incapable of making mistakes. 47 and Jeffrey Epstein’s rich friends will never be brought to trial because the guy who lies about his weight does not make mistakes.

It is not a mistake.

Donald Trump didn’t stumble into this behavior.

He didn’t misspeak.

He didn’t accidentally undermine justice or protect himself. He has been broadcasting that since he first descended that escalator.

What is a mistake is those who voted for and continue to support him, expecting anything different from him and pretending he will evolve.

When someone shows you, over and over, what they are, and you still hand them power, what follows is not a mistake. It is a choice.

It is on you.

But make no mistake that it is going to take decades to clean up this mess.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

No, ICE Please. A Proposal for Beverage-Based Resistance

“No ICE please!”

There’s a moment that happens dozens of times a day across America.
A barista asks, “Would you like that iced?”
A server says, “Ice with your water?”

It’s such an ordinary exchange that it barely registers. Pure autopilot.

But what if this tiny interaction could double as political expression? What if the simple act of ordering a drink could quietly signal resistance to Trump’s version of law enforcement cosplay?

Here’s my proposal.

When asked about ice in your beverage, respond:

“I don’t support ICE.”
or “Who needs ICE?”
or “I don’t need no stinkin’ ICE.”
or simply, “No ICE, please.”

Yes, it’s a pun.
Yes, it’s a little absurd.
And, yes, very me.

In my experience, the best forms of peaceful resistance usually come with a smirk.


Why This Works

The genius of this approach is its accessibility.

You don’t need to attend a march (though you should).
You don’t need to donate money (though that helps).
You don’t need special skills, a sign, or a Substack essay.

You just need to order a drink — something you were going to do anyway.

The double meaning creates an easy conversational hook. The barista might laugh. They might look confused. They might just nod and move on. All you have to do is smile.

You don’t need to launch into a TED Talk about immigration policy. If they ask, explain. If they don’t, that’s fine too. The seed is planted.

This isn’t about ambushing service workers with political diatribes. It’s about small, human moments of awareness. Less lecture, more signal flare.

Politics isn’t separate from daily life.
It is daily life. Even at the coffee counter.


The Power of Repetition

Now imagine thousands of people doing this.

Baristas hear it five times a shift.
Servers start recognizing it.
It spreads from coffee shops to diners to airport bars.

It becomes a quiet, low-key signal — a wink between strangers. A tiny “hey, me too.”

That’s how ideas travel. Through repetition. Through ordinary spaces.

“We are the 99 percent.”
“Black Lives Matter.”
Simple phrases that moved from words to movements.

“No ICE, please” isn’t trying to be the next historic slogan — but it can still do something useful: keep the issue alive in our heads.

Because it’s easy to read a brutal news story about raids or deportations, feel furious for 20 minutes, and then go back to scrolling.

But if you’re saying this every time you order coffee, you’re reminded. Regularly. Personally.

It stays with you.


Discomfort as a Feature, Not a Bug

Some people will find this awkward.

Good.

Comfort is rarely where change happens.

When we confine politics to protests or social media, the rest of life stays neatly undisturbed. Meanwhile, immigration policy is disturbing people’s lives every single day.

A mildly weird moment at the counter feels like a fair trade.

That said: read the room.

If your server is drowning in a lunch rush or clearly exhausted, maybe just skip the ice and spare them the bit. The goal is awareness, not making underpaid workers endure your performance art.

Be kind. Be human.
Just also be willing to be a little weird.


From Beverages to Ballots

Let’s be clear: refusing ice will not reform immigration policy.

This is symbolic. And symbols alone are empty.

But symbols paired with action? That’s where things get interesting.

Think of this as a gateway habit.

Start with the joke.
Then donate.
Volunteer.
Call your reps.
Show up locally.
Vote like it matters — because it does.

The drink order isn’t the revolution. It’s the reminder.


The Revolution Will Be Caffeinated

Or decaf. Your call.

Resistance doesn’t always look like marches and megaphones. Sometimes it looks like a dad joke with a political edge. Sometimes it’s just refusing to let the most important issues of our time disappear into the background noise of everyday life.

So the next time someone asks if you want ice?

You know what to say.

No ICE, please.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Minnesota Nice

Paul, it’s called “Minnesota Nice.”

A long time ago — when Donald Trump was still on his first wife and had only three bankruptcies under his belt — my best friend moved to Wayzata, Minnesota. At the time, he was on the fast track at one of the largest insurance brokers in the world, and with my New Yorker’s view of life, I couldn’t fathom why they’d send him somewhere that regularly posted the coldest temperatures in the nation.

In other words, I was an ignorant bastard.

And he set me straight.

He told me the Twin Cities was one of the biggest corporate hubs in America — a startling number of Fortune 500 companies and dozens more on the rise. This wasn’t exile. It was a promotion. He was excited.

I, being a smart-ass New Yorker, just smiled and nodded.

“Good for you. If you’re happy, I’m happy.”

And off he went.

I figured I’d visit eventually. No rush.

Then he called and invited me for Thanksgiving. My own family had scattered that year, so I said yes.

When I landed, it was 20 degrees and snowing — basically confirming every dumb prejudice I had. But four years in Syracuse trains you for this kind of cold, so I wasn’t rattled.

On the way to his place, Rich said we needed groceries. His wife was on bed rest with complications from her second pregnancy. We stopped at Lunds in Wayzata. The size of the store — enormous compared to the shoebox markets back home — barely registers now.

What I remember is this:

Rich split the list in half and sent me off on my own.

I was completely out of my depth.

So I did what city people rarely do — I asked strangers for help.

And they didn’t just point. They walked me there. Smiled. Chatted. Helped like it was the most normal thing in the world.

The next day the high was 17. (November, folks.) We took his three-year-old to the Minnesota Zoo. Five hundred acres — nearly twice the size of the Bronx Zoo — trails, exhibits, space to breathe. A public park disguised as a zoo.

We started with the monorail.

Which, naturally, is where his kid chose to absolutely melt down.

As a single guy, I had zero tools for this situation. Rich wasn’t much better prepared. In New York, we would’ve gotten eye-rolls and side-eye.

Instead?

A couple of Minnesota moms swooped in like angels, calm and cheerful, helping us settle Patrick down so everyone could enjoy the ride.

No drama. No judgment. Just help.

That night, after dinner, when the house finally went quiet, Rich and I sat by the fire with a couple fingers of Macallan 18 — my single-malt phase. We stared into the flames for a while.

Then he asked, “So… what do you think?”

“Of the Scotch, the fire, or Minnesota?”

He’d known me since we were larva. The look he gave me said: knock it off.

I grinned.

“The Scotch is amazing. The fire is perfect. And the people here are so nice.”

“Yeah,” he said. “They call it Minnesota Nice.”

He lived there almost four years. I visited often. And little by little, I figured out what that phrase really meant.

It’s holding the door.

Helping your neighbor shovel.

Making small talk in long lines just to pass the time.

Sharing what you have.

Choosing kind instead of blunt.

Polite instead of confrontational.

Harmony instead of conflict.

It’s soft strength.

And lately, I’ve been thinking about that a lot.

The deaths of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti — say their names — cut me to the quick. They reminded me that Minnesota Nice isn’t just manners.

It’s courage.

It’s saying, “Hey, I don’t hate you,” when someone else is spoiling for a fight.

It’s stepping in to help a stranger, even when it puts you at risk.

It’s standing beside your neighbor — documented or not — because they’re part of your community. Because they’re human.

Minnesota Nice means doing the right thing, even when it’s hard.

Even when it costs you.

The next few years, let alone the next couple of months, are going to be tough. We need to stand tall and be Minnesota nice.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WAFFLES!

WAFFLES!

That’s the proclamation I make to my wife, sister, and friends when the fluffy white stuff is falling from the sky.

This isn’t due to a brain injury or a neurodiverse condition. I know it’s snowing. I could easily say “snow.” But I don’t, because those who know me understand that long ago, in some breakfast corner of my deep, dark past, I decided I like waffles far too much. Given the opportunity, I would eat them every day, in every way. (The possibilities are endless: with chicken, fruit, stuffed, savory, Belgian-style, as sandwiches… you get the idea.)

I needed to curb my obsession with waffles; otherwise, I’d have to double my time at the gym—or my wardrobe allowance—as my waistline kept expanding.

So I made a deal with myself: I would only have waffles on days that it snowed.

Hence the happy, happy, joy-joy proclamation.

As you can imagine, I’ve been thinking a lot about waffles this past week. Not only did we get six inches of snow on Monday, but all week long the weather prognosticators have been issuing increasingly alarming statements about the storm predicted for Sunday and Monday.

Or, as I prefer to hear it: two days of waffles. Oh yeah.

But winter storms weren’t the only reason waffles were on my mind. Like any right-minded person, I drown my waffles in warm pools of wonderful Canadian maple syrup. This past weekend I noticed I was out, so in my weekly Instacart order I added a jug of Kirkland’s finest. It was $14.99.

That seemed high.

So I looked it up. Last year at this time it was $12.99 — a 15% increase despite a bumper crop year. In other words, our demented leader, in his haste to prove his masculinity by imposing tariffs on countries that wouldn’t bend the knee, had made maple syrup a little less sweet for me.

But me being me, I had to take it a step further.

So I did a little research and came up with this grid.

The most positive thing I can say about this data is that consumers in the U.S. only had to pay about 10% more for their waffle breakfast in 2025 compared to 2024. And the only reason that’s positive is because it means retailers are absorbing some of the tariff costs.

The bad news starts with this: our waffles cost more than they did last year because of the non compos mentis whims of Trump, while our neighbors to the north saw virtually no inflation in the cost of their waffles.

It ends with an economic certainty. Even if tariffs come down tomorrow, we’ll still pay more for our waffles. Prices are sticky downward. Once retailers see what you’re willing to pay, reductions take a long time. COVID reminded us of that economic fact, and now retailers use AI-enhanced pricing tools that turn ordinary inelasticity into something closer to arthritis.

This didn’t ruin my love for waffles. I wouldn’t let Donald Trump do that to me.

Besides, waking up every morning without a news alert saying he didn’t survive the night already feels suboptimal.

But waffles gave me something else: hope.

Well, not exactly my waffles. The hope came from the Prime Minister of Canada, whose blessed maple syrup makes them sweet. His speech in Davos, delivered before global economic leaders, was a concise takedown of Trump’s economic agenda in a little more than ten minutes.

It was a call for realism, courage, and collective action among mid-sized democracies. He argued that the old world order is gone, that compliance is dangerous, and that only coordinated strategic autonomy can protect national values and interests.

He essentially told the emperor he had no clothes. As he put it, “the power of the less powerful begins with honesty.” The post-WWII order, he argued, has become a convenient myth. Middle-sized countries no longer need the United States to protect them, guarantee their currencies, or safeguard their geopolitical interests. The myth was worth sustaining as long as America acted in everyone’s best interest. But when it prioritizes only itself, that myth stops serving anyone.

He warned that “while there is a strong tendency for countries to go along to get along… to hope that compliance will buy safety… it won’t.”

And he declared, “Other countries, especially intermediate powers like Canada, are not powerless. They have the capacity to build a new order that encompasses our values.”

It was a calm, well-reasoned dismantling of the myths Trump has sold to MAGA and the U.S. — the idea that American exceptionalism means other countries must kowtow simply because we have a bigger economy and military. Carney reminded us that American exceptionalism was supposed to be about values. Other countries cooperated as long as those values aligned with their interests. Now that they don’t, the myth is losing its power.

Which brings me back to waffles.

The unspoken truth about eating waffles on snowy days is that they give me joy on a day when it would be easy to surrender to confinement, cold feet, and fogged glasses. And as delicious as my waffles were on Monday—and will be tomorrow—Mark Carney’s speech at Davos was an emotional waffle I needed in this long ICEy winter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“That’s Fine, Dude. I’m Not Mad at You.”

How this government responded to kindness with bullets — and what that says about us

“That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

Those were the last words Renee Nicole Good ever spoke.

They were not uttered in anger. They were not provocative. They were said with warmth, understanding, and a smile — a tacit acknowledgment that the ICE officer in front of her was doing what his superiors had asked of him.

After collecting her wife, she backed away from the officer and attempted to leave. There was no attempt to use her car as a weapon. No high-speed getaway. No obscene gestures. No threats. Just: “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

Seconds later, Jonathan Ross pulled out his pistol and fired three shots into her car, killing her — denying her children their mother and her wife her partner.


No Aid. No Urgency. No Accountability.

The ICE officers on scene did not administer first aid. Instead, they blocked medical personnel from reaching her. It was not until six minutes later, when Minneapolis Fire and EMS arrived, that anyone attended to a woman whose only offense was caring deeply about her neighbors.

Let’s be clear: Renee Nicole Good was not a member of a domestic terrorist organization. She was not part of this government’s imagined boogeyman known as “ANTIFA.” She was a mother doing what mothers do — standing up for her family and her neighborhood.

According to her family, she fervently believed that we are on this earth to love and care for one another, and to bring warmth and creativity into the lives of those around us.


This Government Had a Choice

This government could have paused.
It could have reflected.
It could have acknowledged that something had gone terribly wrong.

It chose not to.

Instead, in the aftermath of this tragedy, this government chose not to question the actions of masked, unbadged ICE officers. It chose to blame a soccer mom with stuffed animals jammed into her glove box.


Words Matter. Lies Matter More.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said:

“It is very clear this individual was harassing and impeding law enforcement operations.”

I don’t know about you, but telling a masked officer “That’s fine, dude. I don’t hate you,” said with a smile, does not meet any reasonable standard of harassment. It sounds more like the verbal equivalent of a warm hug — one that might, if handled properly, end with a cup of cocoa.

Noem then defended Officer Ross by saying he “followed his training and did exactly what he’s been taught to do … and took actions to defend himself and his fellow law enforcement officers.”

The standard for using deadly force is well established:

  • The threat must be immediate
  • The individual must have the capability to cause serious harm
  • There must be clear intent
  • Reasonable alternatives must be unavailable

Additionally, FBI guidance is clear: officers are not supposed to fire at a fleeing vehicle.

Noem’s statements leave us with only two possibilities. Either she is lying — something that has become distressingly routine in this government — or Officer Ross truly did follow his training. If it is the latter, then this government is sanctioning the killing of soccer moms for saying something as dangerously inflammatory as:

“Dude, I’m not mad at you.”


The Vice President Weighs In

Vice President J.D. Vance called the killing “a tragedy of her own making.” He ignored the reality that the ICE presence itself was inflammatory, particularly in the context of this administration’s rhetoric. He also claimed Ross had “absolute immunity,” apparently under the belief that asserting something makes it true — a level of reasoning one expects from a nine-year-old, not the second most powerful person in the country.


What This Means for Our Democracy

What horrifies me most is not just this killing, but what it represents.

It moves us one step farther from constitutional democracy and one step closer to authoritarianism.

The First Amendment guarantees free speech and peaceful expression. That is exactly what Renee Nicole Good was exercising. There was no violence. No imminent threat. Her expression of dissent was simply:

“That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

And how did this government respond? Not with accountability — the most profoundly American value — but by blaming a mythical far-left cabal and a soccer mom who preached kindness and compassion.


This Is Ours to Own

Like it or not, this is our government doing this. We are responsible for the actions of Trump, Vance, and Noem. We must call out their lies, their misdirection, and their hypocrisies — and we must hold them accountable.

With all due respect to Renee Nicole Good, I say this:

Hey, dudes. I am mad at you — and I won’t rest until you are out of power, and those who deserve it are held fully accountable under the law.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment